In the view of my language law, the shortage of basic symbols
(either the writing or the sound) would lead to extend the length of writing
word or pronunciation. Since the longer pronunciation cause inconvenience, so,
in everyday use, people tend to cut short the size in either writing or
pronunciation. I have given the prove that since compound words male-cattle,
female-cattle, young-cattle, male-sheep, female-sheep, young-sheep, male-pig,
female-pig and young-pig are too long for everyday use, then people invented
the word of bull, cow, calf, ram, ewe, lamb, boar, sow and piglet etc. the
target is no other than cut short the expressing time, think about if a farmer
speaks a compound word as female-pig instead sow one thousand times a day, how
boring he will be? But the cost is you have to learn another group of words. It
was the main reason of why the English vocabulary soaring up to one million
words yet the Chinese vocabulary still keep in the level of three thousand
characters. For the short pronunciation allow that language using compound
words widely. But the Chinese language is not always like this. In the ancient
time, Chinese did have single characters as bull, cow, calf, ram, ewe, lamb,
boar, sow and piglet etc. The most typical character is 牡=bull, 牝=cow.
The Chinese is pictogram language, you may see both the character have a symbol
as 牜,
it is the simplified writing of 牛, this symbol is from:
So every Chinese characters about cattle have this symbol as牜. Now let’s talking about the other part of that two
character. The other part represent the gender.
没有评论:
发表评论