For a brief summary, we may understand that from pictogram
turned into alphabet is in fact changed the writing and pronouncing system from
open into some arbitrary limited signals. It means to say the inventor believed
that the information of the whole universal could be represented by twenty
something alphabets. One step more we may find the further simplification would
lead the invention of modern computer or the Morse code. Yet the binary system
had been invented since ancient China as 八卦 eight diagrams:
But no one dared to use them for language, because with only
two symbols, even in the ancient time, the necessary words were far more than
this. Likewise, in China no one think about using twenty something alphabet for
language, because such few symbols still could not meet the requirement. On the
contrary until now, no one of alphabet language have ever ask such a question
that for simplification the Morse code even simpler, why not use them for our
language? Why just stopped at 20-30 alphabets? But, when the electronic
computer appeared, at the beginning the software maker first invent ASCII, then
Unicode. Each system has more symbols than other. That is to say the
information of future is unknown, we have to invent more and more symbols to
face the unknown universe. With this knowledge, again, when reviewing the
alphabetic revolution we may find it maybe not as admirable as we thought
before. It maybe a little bit rash to limited our writing and pronouncing
system in a certain range. It similar the grammar, that restricted the
expressing by few certain rule. As if the inventors already knew what would
have happened today and future. The Bible in Greece was roughly using a
vocabulary of five thousands. And what a vocabulary used in everyday life of
the ancient Phoenician? Their information could be much less than Bible and
with such a handful information, how could they lay down the constitution of
our language?
I think all the problem came from the unchanged quantity of
alphabet for thousand years. It seemed like that today we still use computer of
486, and change the software forever. Do you think the hardware can match the
software? The difference between cipher code and natural language is the former
is only available in a small area and the more inconvenient the better. But the
natural language is on the contrary, it prefer fully use the whole five sense
to meet the requirement of the universe and the more convenient the
better.
没有评论:
发表评论